🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sadness for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.