🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous respondents applauding your advice on growing your business? Are headhunters reaching out to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions indicated that switching their profile gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system favors male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which users - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", described extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed unhappiness with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her ethnicity to "white" reported a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments occur alongside ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a professional network and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by male and female users received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be growing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly competitive and unpredictable."